Skip to main content

FUBAR: Food Fight Scenarios

The primary time I have to play FUBAR will most likely end up being lunch, when both me and my co worker are free.  To that end and to keep each battle from just becoming a slog fest, scenarios seem like the ideal way forward.

Ideally each scenario should take one to one and a half hour(s) to play.  This play time starts from the first initiative roll and ends when the victory condition is met.  I'm not including terrain set up in this, as terrain can be set up in advance and left for lunch.  This would also include any pre game unit set up.

But how many turns can be expected in that time frame?  Based on the first game, a reasonable assumption of eight minutes per turn average could be expected (11 turns/90 minutes).  Some will be faster, some a little longer, but I think eight minutes will be a good rule of thumb.  Working with this number, lets assume 8 turns minimum, 12 maximum, 10 being a good average to work with (And nicely rounded to boot).  So going forward, lets aim on most scenarios being 10 turns in length.

Does this turn count work?  Lets take a basic scenario: McGuffin is in the middle of the table, a seasoned squad (4+ activation) needs to move from its deployment zone (we'll assume a 6'x4' table, with 1' deployment zone on the long edge), be touching the McGuffin at the end of squad movement and then retreat off its own long edge, within ten turns.  Assuming it starts on the edge of its deployment zone, that leads to a distance of 1' to get to the McGuffin, then 2' of retreat distance.  The fastest the squad could make the distance is to the McGuffin is one turn, then two turns to get back of the table for a total of three turns.  But a better estimate is probably six turns as the squad will fail to active 50% of the time.  This also is handily the turn estimate for that same squad making it to the /OPPONENTS/ deployment edge.  So ten turns should handle most of what I'll need for these quick and easy scenarios.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gondor Warriors Test Recipe

Basecoating   1. Black primer via a rattlecan 2. Base coat "Abaddon Black" 3. Overbrush Vallejo 70.995 (German Camo Black) heavily 4. Not on these, but think another lighter over brush of a lighter grey would help.  Maybe a 1:1   70.995 with an ivory or other.   5. GW Lead Belcher on armor 6. Iraqi Dark Sand on the shield trees.  Less important the color here, just an ivory  7. Wash the whole model with "Nuln Oil" making sure not to pool Armor 1. Thick edge highlights of GW Iron Breaker Gloves 1. Base GW Gorthor Brown 2. Heavy wash Agrax Earthshade 3. Highlight back Gorthor Brown Belts/Scabbards 1. Base GW Steel Legion Drab 2. Heavy wash Agrax Earthshade 3. Highlight Vallejo Game Color 72.061 "Khaki" Flesh 1. Base GW Bugman's glow 2. Wash Agrax Earthshade 3. Highlight Bugman's Glow 4. Highlight Reaper Tanned Skin Bows 1. Base GW Mournfang Brown 2. Base tips GW Balthasar Gold 3. Wash Agrax Earthshade 4. High tips with Burnished Gold

Heresy Hellmites

80 Skaven clan rats have been painted up, only awaiting the dozens of fellow to make up the rest of the army...  To take a break I did a quick paint job on Heresy's Hellmites: Nothing fancy, just a three color dry bush to get them up and off the table.  Lovely little sculpts, but I think I mismatched some of the backs to bodies. Colors: Body: Base GW Chardonite Granite, Wash Black, Highlight Graveyard earth Beaks: Base Tausept Ochre, Wash Black, Highlight Graveyard Earth Sack: Base VMC Hull Red, Wash GW Badab Black, Highlight Dark Flesh, Highlight Blood Red, Wash Ogryn Flesh Base: Mushroom, Wash Raw Umber, Drybrush Mushroom, Drybrush Butter Pecan, Drybrush Vintage White.  Army Painter 4mm/6mm grass tufts.

Syberia, My Take

So, finally played through and beat Syberia 1 & 2, which have been on my list of games to play for... 5 years now? Was really looking forward to seeing a modern graphics adventure game. Pros: -Lush environments that looked beautiful -Steam punk aesthetic that I liked -The Russian environments and slant were a nice break from standard western/asian themes Cons: -Interaction areas didn't stand out. This made some puzzles into frustrating experiences since I had to go back and try to figure out what I missed, which wasn't always obvious as items blended into the background. -Story was so-so. Second one felt much more engaging then the first though. -Felt like a lot of back and forth puzzles, I.E. run over here, do one thing, run over there and do one thing, run back do one thing. Which is kind of annoying. I accept that not every puzzle will be self contained, but sometimes it got annoying.